Why Investing Isn’t One-Size-Fits-All: Adapting Your Portfolio Through Life and Hype
- Krists Eiduks
- Aug 24
- 4 min read
“There’s no single recipe for investment success. It has to fit the investor’s circumstances, psychology, and objectives.”
Howard Marks, Oaktree Capital Management
The Myth of the Universal Strategy
When we’re young and just starting our investing journey, the world seems so black-and-white: a single “ideal portfolio” appears to fit everyone. Ask around, and you’ll hear confidence in a one-size-fits-all strategy—diversify across broad asset classes, stay in the market, and ride the compounding wave. That foundational logic isn’t wrong—but it’s incomplete.
As life unfolds—careers shift, families grow, financial responsibilities change—the story of that one perfect portfolio begins to unravel. Liquidity needs, risk tolerance, and life goals evolve. What works at 25 might feel reckless or irrelevant at 50. A truly resilient portfolio must flex alongside your life.
Influencers vs. Reality: The Illusion of Simplicity
Scrolling through Instagram or TikTok, it's easy to stumble upon influencers hailing a single investment as the ultimate money-maker. Rarely do they disclose their actual holdings, fund size, or the nuances of their decision-making. Many don’t even manage meaningful portfolios themselves.
We must ask: “Are they promoting something they’ve tested with skin in the game—and succeeded—or is it merely hype?” Reality tends to get shy on social media.
The Copycat Trap: Why Following Big Investors Isn’t a Strategy
Another trend in retail investing is the “copycat” approach—blindly following the trades of successful investors or institutions. On the surface, it feels like a shortcut: if Warren Buffett or Ray Dalio buys a stock, it must be a winner, right?
But here’s the fundamental error: unless you understand why an investment was made and how it fits into that investor’s broader strategy, you are chasing a stock for the wrong reason.
Take the example of Berkshire Hathaway’s large stake in Occidental Petroleum (OXY). Many retail investors piled in, assuming Buffett simply viewed OXY as a cheap, undervalued stock with big upside. But the decision was strategic. Berkshire already had significant exposure to energy through utilities and railroads. OXY provided an integrated way to secure long-term, reliable energy inputs—supporting Berkshire’s existing ecosystem of businesses, not just a bet on crude prices.
For Buffett, OXY was part of a portfolio synergy decision. For a retail investor without those same underlying holdings, the rationale is completely different. Chasing the same stock without understanding context is like borrowing someone else’s prescription glasses—they don’t improve your vision, they distort it.
Similarly, hedge funds like Bridgewater Associates publish their 13F filings, which many retail investors study religiously. But those holdings are often part of a macro-hedging framework—with derivatives, currencies, and other exposures not visible in the filing. Copying just the equity slice of that strategy strips it of its protective layers, leaving only naked positions without the balancing logic.
The lesson: your conviction has to be your own. It is not enough to know what was bought—you must know why it was bought, and whether that “why” fits your own portfolio goals.
Fundamentally Challenging Times: Why Adaptability Matters
The classic fundamental-valuation investor—who analyzes earnings, cash flows, and competitive moats—is finding it tougher these days. In the U.S. market, price often seems to lead fundamentals—not the other way around.
Research from JPMorgan Chase found that up to 40% of retail investment flows are driven by recent price performance and volatility—not by fundamentals. Younger, lower-income investors are especially prone to this behavior. (jpmorganchase.com)
Day trading and meme-stock phenomena have dramatically altered market behavior. By 2021, retail investors accounted for 25% of total U.S. equity trading volume—double what it was a decade earlier—fueled by accessibility, stimulus money, and social media buzz. (redwheel.com)
When price momentum and social contagion drive investing decisions, the fundamentals take a backseat.
The AI Hype Machine: Productivity Boom—or Bubble?
Consider the AI boom. The market’s enthusiasm around artificial intelligence is palpable—and maybe premature.
A July 2025 MIT report found that 95% of AI investments produce no measurable returns. (ft.com, thetimes.co.uk)
Despite this, mega-cap tech companies are pouring nearly $1 trillion into AI from 2024 to 2026. Morgan Stanley projects annual benefits to large-cap firms of around $920 billion, potentially adding $13–16 trillion to S&P 500 market value. (barrons.com, businessinsider.com)
Yet, skeptics warn: AI capex may struggle to counteract broader economic weakness. A strategist at BCA Research estimates a 60% probability of recession within a year, noting AI alone may not be enough to shield the economy. (businessinsider.com)
Such divergence underscores why relying solely on hype or a single thesis is dangerous.
Building a Portfolio That Grows with You
Here’s how to build something more robust:
Know your stage and needs. Early career? Focus on growth and long-term gains. Mid-life with liabilities? Blend growth with income and liquidity.
Mix strategies. Pair value-investing principles (companies trading below intrinsic worth) with growth opportunities—but don’t lean too heavily on either.
Stay informed, not influenced. Social media ups your FOMO. Real insight comes from transparent data and analysis, not trending “opportunity” posts.
Expect adaptability. Market regimes shift—from momentum to retracements, from inflation to slowdown. Your portfolio should pivot, not panic.
Mind the valuations. Avoid paying up for hype without discernible value—especially in sectors like AI. Let fundamentals—and sanity—lead.
Conviction must be personal. Borrowing conviction from others leads to fragility. Build your portfolio from reasoning that reflects your goals, not someone else’s.
Final Thoughts
Investing isn’t a reflex; it’s a craft that changes as you—and the world—change. A static portfolio is a brittle one.
Influencers may promise easy, single-solution success. Big-name investors may tempt you into copying their trades. But true resilience comes from thoughtful, adaptable portfolios built on your own reasoning, with conviction rooted in your reality—not theirs.
Comments